The Center for Michigan has taken a long, intensive look at state House Speaker Andy Dillion's healthcare plan and has come to the conclusion that the state needs to take a long, intensive look at implementing the reform."We are endorsing the exploration of the idea," says John Bebow, executive director of the Ann Arbor-based think-and-do tank. "The idea of trying to find new solutions is what we're applauding."Dillion, a Democrat from Redford, proposed pooling the health benefits for all municipal employees in Michigan earlier this summer. The idea is that the large pool of tens of thousands of employees will create a tremendous amount of efficiencies and savings. Dillion claims it will save the state about $1 billion.The innovative proposal has drawn applause and fire from different sections of the power elite in Lansing. Business-based interests and state Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop (R-Rochester) have endorsed it as an easy choice to help play a significant part in fixing Michigan’s chronic budget deficit. Labor unions and Gov. Jennifer Granholm have decried the plan, saying there is no proof it will create cost savings.The Center for Michigan's study of seven other states that pool municipal employees health benefits show that these state pay $6,435 per employee. Michigan spends an average of $9,386 per employee, about 53 percent higher. The Center for Michigan studied California, Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Washington and Wisconsin. Bebow admits that all states and their circumstances are not created equal, but this is the best comparison available."It's not apples to apples because apples to apples doesn't exist," Bebow says.Source: John Bebow, executive director of The Center for MichiganWriter: Jon Zemke